Just an FYI. 3 wheel vehicles are legal in Ontario, Canada under a 10 year pilot program by the ministry of transportation.
Here's the highlights:
- Only need a G class licence to drive
- Registered as a motorcycle
- Needs to have a seatbelt and use a helmet to operate
More details:
Three-Wheeled Vehicles
Ontario launched a new pilot to permit three-wheeled vehicles (TWVs) on Ontario’s roads on
March 1, 2016.
Why is Ontario permitting three-wheeled vehicles?
The pilot is intended to assess these vehicles over a ten-year period of time in order to examine their ability to safely integrate with other vehicle types to determine whether existing rules of the road are adequate and to and to consider operating and licensing requirements.
About the pilot:
Only federally approved three-wheeled vehicles designed for on-road use are permitted to participate in the pilot;
The pilot will run for 10 years;
Current Highway Traffic Act (HTA) rules of the road and penalties apply to the driver/vehicle owner;
Operators are required to have a full G class driver’s licence or higher;
For the purposes of vehicle registration, three-wheeled vehicles are registered as motorcycles and pay the corresponding fee;
Three-wheeled vehicles are subject to Ontario’s mandatory seat belt requirements and the use of an approved motorcycle safety helmet;
Passengers who are classified as infants, toddlers, pre-schoolers or primary grade children are not permitted;
Three-wheeled vehicles are prohibited from being used for an Ontario driver’s licence road test;
No sidecars or trailers are permitted for use on a three-wheeled vehicle.
Safety features of three-wheeled vehicles
Three-wheeled vehicles have fewer safety features than passenger cars.
While the physical design of three-wheeled vehicles may resemble many safety features of passenger cars (e.g. seat belts, steering wheel, pedals), three-wheeled vehicles are not designed to satisfy the requirements of passenger cars. The safety regulations for three-wheeled vehicles used on roads are set out by the federal government in its Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations Schedule III.
This strict pilot framework encourages innovation in Ontario’s automotive sector while maintaining road safety.
For full details of the pilot project, please see Ontario Regulation 28/16.
ONTARIO REGULATION 28/16
made under the
HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ACT
PILOT PROJECT - THREE-WHEELED VEHICLES
Made: February 10, 2016
Filed: February 12, 2016
Published on e-Laws: February 12, 2016
Printed in The Ontario Gazette: February 27, 2016
Interpretation
Definitions
1. In this Regulation,
“Ontario Regulation 340/94” means Ontario Regulation 340/94 (Drivers’ Licences) made under the Act;
“Ontario Regulation 376/02” means Ontario Regulation 376/02 (Classification of Vehicles as Irreparable, Salvage and Rebuilt) made under the Act;
“Regulation 587” means Regulation 587 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Equipment) made under the Act;
“Regulation 601” means Regulation 601 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Motor Vehicle Inspection Stations) made under the Act;
“Regulation 610” means Regulation 610 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Safety Helmets) made under the Act;
“Regulation 611” means Regulation 611 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Safety Inspections) made under the Act;
“Regulation 613” means Regulation 613 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Seat Belt Assemblies) made under the Act;
“Regulation 628” means Regulation 628 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Vehicle Permits) made under the Act.
“three-wheeled vehicle” means a motor vehicle, other than a motor tricycle as defined in Regulation 587, that,
(a) is designed to travel on three wheels in contact with the ground,
(b) has not more than four designated seating positions, and
(c) has a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating of 1,000 kilograms or less or, if it does not have a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating, the sum of its unloaded vehicle mass and the product obtained by multiplying its seating capacity by 68 kilograms is 1,000 kilograms or less.
Pilot Project
Pilot project established
2. (1) A pilot project to evaluate the use of three-wheeled vehicles on highways is established.
(2) The Minister shall conduct and complete an evaluation of the use of three-wheeled vehicles on highways under the pilot project before the tenth anniversary of the day this Regulation comes into force.
Prohibitions and Permitted Use
Prohibitions
3. (1) No person shall drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway, except as permitted by this Regulation.
(2) No person shall drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway with a passenger who is classified as an infant, toddler or pre-school to primary grade child under subsection 8 (1) of Regulation 613.
Permitted use of three-wheeled vehicles
4. A person may drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway if the vehicle,
(a) bears,
(i) in the case of a three-wheeled vehicle manufactured or built in Canada, the manufacturer’s compliance label issued under section 6 of the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations (Canada) specifying the type of vehicle as “TWV/VTR” or,
(ii) in the case of an imported three-wheeled vehicle, a compliance label or other label as provided for in section 12 of those Regulations;
(b) continues to meet the regulatory standards that applied to it at the time it was manufactured or imported;
(c) is in good working order;
(d) is not equipped with a side car or trailer; and
(e) is driven by a driver who holds a valid Class A, B, C, D, E, F or G driver’s licence that authorizes him or her to drive the vehicle or is a resident of another province, country or state, or a resident of Ontario for less than 60 days, who is authorized to drive the vehicle under subsection 34 (1) or (2) of the Act.
Application of Act and Regulations
Application of Act
5. The Act and the regulations apply to three-wheeled vehicles as provided in this Regulation.
Three-wheeled vehicle generally deemed not a motorcycle
6. Subject to sections 7, 8 and 9, a three-wheeled vehicle operated in accordance with this Regulation is deemed not to be a motorcycle for the purposes of the Act and the regulations, including, for greater certainty, for the purposes of Ontario Regulation 340/94.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for registration purposes
7. A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of the following:
1. Part II (Permits) of the Act.
2. Regulation 628.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for helmet requirements
8. A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of section 104 of the Act and Regulation 610.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for classification as irreparable, etc.
9. (1) A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of Ontario Regulation 376/02, other than subsections 2 (1) and (2) of that Regulation, which do not apply to a three-wheeled vehicle.
(2) If a person described in paragraph 1 of subsection 4 (1) of Ontario Regulation 376/02 is making the determination that a three-wheeled vehicle is irreparable, the determination shall be based on an inspection of the vehicle carried out by a person described in subsection 2 (1) or (2) of that Regulation.
(3) The definition of “irreparable” in subsection 1 (1) of Ontario Regulation 376/02 is modified in respect of three-wheeled vehicles as follows:
1. For a three-wheeled vehicle with a full frame assembly,
“irreparable” means a vehicle that,
(a) is a total loss and,
(i) has incurred structural damage requiring the replacement by cutting and welding of any integral part of its full frame assembly, or
(ii) has been stolen and dismantled such that the retail price for new parts of a like kind to replace those parts missing or damaged exceeds the fair labour cost to install or repair those parts, and,
(A) a settlement of an insurance claim has been paid for the vehicle as a total loss, or
(B) the vehicle is owned, leased or the plate portion of its vehicle permit is held by a person who is an insurer within the meaning of clause (b) of the definition of “insurer”, or
(b) is classified by the Registrar as irreparable under subsection 199.1 (11) of the Act.
2. For a three-wheeled vehicle with a unibody assembly,
“irreparable” means a vehicle that,
(a) is a total loss and,
(i) has been immersed in liquid to the bottom of its dashboard or higher,
(ii) any major part of its electrical system has been, or appears to have been, immersed in liquid,
(iii) has incurred damage requiring the replacement of one or more of the structural assemblies listed in Part 1, 2, 3 or 4 of the Schedule, or
(iv) has been stolen and dismantled such that the retail price for new parts of a like kind to replace those parts missing or damaged exceeds the fair labour cost to install or repair those parts, and,
(A) a settlement of an insurance claim has been paid for the vehicle as a total loss, or
(B) the vehicle is owned, leased or the plate portion of its vehicle permit is held by a person who is an insurer within the meaning of clause (b) of the definition of “insurer”, or
(b) is classified by the Registrar as irreparable under subsection 199.1 (11) of the Act.
Inspection requirements
10. (1) Despite section 3 of Regulation 611, the inspection requirements and performance standards contained in Schedules 1 and 2 to that Regulation that apply to a three-wheeled vehicle are subject to the following modification:
1. The chain, belt or driven sprocket shall not be excessively worn, frayed or loose and no fasteners in connection with those parts shall be missing, loose, cut or damaged.
(2) Despite section 3 of Regulation 601, a Type 1, 2 or 4 licence is authority to inspect and certify three-wheeled vehicles in accordance with the inspection requirements and performance standards contained in Schedules 1 and 2 to Regulation 611 as modified by subsection (1).
(3) Despite subsection 8 (3) of Regulation 601, a motor vehicle inspection mechanic who holds only a certificate of qualification in the trade of motorcycle technician may issue safety standards certificates for three-wheeled vehicles.
Reports
Reports to Minister
11. If requested to do so by the Minister, an owner of a three-wheeled vehicle shall report to the Minister on the owner’s use of the vehicle under the pilot project, or on any aspect of that use that may be specified by the Minister.
Amendment, Revocation and Commencement
Amendment
12. (1) Subsections 10 (1) and (2) are revoked and the following substituted:
Inspection requirements
(1) Despite section 3 of Regulation 611, the inspection requirements and performance standards that apply to a three-wheeled vehicle are contained in the Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard, subject to the following modifications:
1. The provisions dealing with electronic stability controls do not apply to a three-wheeled vehicle not manufactured with a stability control system.
2. The chain, belt or driven sprocket shall not be excessively worn, frayed or loose and no fasteners in connection with those parts shall be missing, loose, cut or damaged.
(2) Despite section 3 of Regulation 601, a Type 1, 2 or 4 licence is authority to inspect and certify three-wheeled vehicles in accordance with the inspection requirements and performance standards contained in the Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard as modified by subsection (1).
(2) Section 10 is amended by adding the following subsection:
(4) In this section,
“Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard” means the Reference Handbook entitled “Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard” in English and “Norme d’inspection des véhicules de tourisme et des véhicules utilitaires légers” in French, dated October 2015, published by the Ministry and available on a Government of Ontario website.
Revocation
13. This Regulation is revoked on the tenth anniversary of the day it comes into force.
Commencement
14. (1) Subject to subsection (2), this Regulation comes into force on the later of March 1, 2016 and the day this Regulation is filed.
@gabriel carneiro They've designed it with nordic climates in mind. It's got "vectorized traction control" to get you through any slippery stuff. Get snow tires on on and the AWD version for total control.
I drive a three wheeled Vehicle called a Trihawk. 2 front, one back wheel, sit inside side by side, FWD, convertible. In BC Canada it is considered a 2 door convertible and we only need to wear the seat belts But one guy in Alberta Canada has one and has to wear a helmet because it is considered a motorcycle. So it depends on where you live. Has any one asked Apera about getting them approved for Canada?
Canadian Federal approval would be fantastic, but yeah the Motor Vehicle Acts are controlled by each Province, so it will differ by each one to some degree.
As long as it gets approved by NHTSA, I can't see Transport Canada making a fuss about it.
Some confirmation from Aptera or TC would be nice however for those who have reserved one. 😃
Another question: Will the Aptera qualify for the Federal iZEV rebate? That would be fantastic if it was included.
They need for now an extra wheel, so some lobbying is needed to modify the law (Electrica Mecannica here could be an ally), beside safety certification and that you select a trim with at least 15 kW battery to maximize the rebate. Also the higher trim above 60000$ would need to not be sold in Canada or branded differently:
vehicles with six seats or fewer, where the base model (trim) Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) is less than $45,000
higher priced versions (trims) of these vehicles, up to a maximum MSRP of $55,000, will also be eligible for an incentive
And
vehicles with seven seats or greater, where the base model MSRP is less than $55,000
higher priced versions (trims) of these vehicles, up to a maximum MSRP of $60,000, will also be eligible for an incentive
In all cases, to be eligible under the iZEV program, all vehicles must:
meet all Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
be intended for use on public streets, roads, and highways; and
have at least four functioning wheels and be highway capable (e.g. not a low-speed vehicle)
There are two levels of incentive:
Battery-electric, hydrogen fuel cell, and longer range plug-in hybrid vehicles (battery capacity is 15kWh or more) are eligible for an incentive of $5,000
Shorter range plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (battery capacity is less than 15kWh) are eligible for an incentive of $2,500
To be eligible for the program, electric motorcycles must be in the "open motorcycle" or "motor tricycle" category as defined by the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations (CRC, c. 1038) and be entirely powered by electricity. They must be designed to travel on not more than three wheels and have a maximum speed of more than 70 km/h
The term open is puzzling, but the law refers to a federal definition. So my call minimum 2000$, maybe 8000$. Funny enough, no price limit if a motor cycle. Price limit if considered as a car, but don't care about superior trim, so long the car is sold below 60000 Can$. Now let check BC, they probably have their own set of arbitratry rules also
Basically MRSP below 55 000 $ and at least 85 km of electrical range (no reference about battery size), no reference to price of upper trim. No definition of what is a car, beside that you must be on the updated yearly list. And the rebate is conditional that there is fund left for the fiscal year to finance the rebate.
ZEV Motorcycle got a 2000$ rebate. So the answer is 2000$ for sure, some lobbying to get a full 3000$ rebate
Aptera needs to assist with regulations for import and licensing requirements. Acquire and issue the appropriate regulatory documents. Especially in regards to helmet requirements... should not be needed as is fully enclosed, passed basic crash testing and is heavier than the Ontario pilot project limitations. Exemption stickers should be available.
Great, but I am living in Québec, not in Ontario, so what is matter to me is how it is going to be regulated in Québec. Quebec is notorious to not give a gnat how they do things in Ontario (or other provinces). I put down a deposit, so I have to trust you that Aptera is going to work the legalize hurdles. I might live with a 6e driving permit (one day training for 3 wheel vehicle in Quebec over the permit 5), but I will not going to wear an helmet every time I wan to ride a car. Bonne chance, so far it is exciting.
Yes, same here. I don't believe Nova Scotia has a 3 wheel program like Ontario either, but I have reached out to the RMV to see what or if they have any idea how it may be regulated in my province.
I'd think Québec would be pretty on board, as they have one of if not the highest BEV adoption rates in Canada, perhaps followed up by Ontario and BC, but agreed they usually like to go their own way on lots of things.
If I hear back from my RMV i'll post the response here to compare it to any other responses from other provinces.
I'm in Toronto and bummed about the "Helmet" requirement. That would be a deal changer for me. I do happen to have my motorcycle license, so if that were required, no problem, but if I'm buying this as a "2nd car", my wife definitely woldn't go for a helmet!!!.. By the time my order number comes up (18,000's) it will be the 3rd year, and maybe the regulations will be solved by then!!!
Could you/others in Canada complement any of the Aptera homologation efforts to change / modify things for motorcyles or enclosed autocycles ? And could forthcoming crash test , if proven to meet car results... provide more in regulatory talks?
Obviously I will keep an eye open on Aptera and other three-wheelers manufacturer effort to get certification in Canada and various provinces, as I reserved an Aptera car and I would like much getting through the process.
BC ministry of transport and icbc have a 3 wheeled vehicle category. It was implemented in around 2010. Vehicles in this category, don't require reverse, bumpers, and windows. It requires car plates not motorcycle. But I have not found any info on line so far. Aptera might go in this category.
@Len Yes you need car plates front a rear. I had a problem putting one on my Trihawk. But I figured it out. It lies flat so it does not block the air intake for the air cooled engine. I put My trike on the road before this category came into effect. My Trike is considered a 2 door convertible.
5000 $Can for a vehicle battery above 15 KW, 3000$Can below 15 KW, car MRSP below 55000 $Can. There is a rebate for motorcycle (2 or 3 wheels) requiring a class 6 driving license. Again, everything rely on how the vehicle will be classified.
On a funny note,there is also a rebate for electric snowmobile
Basically 3000 $Can for brand new vehicle (no spec for the battery). The MRSP must be 55 000 $Can or below (sounds like it is becoming a legislative standard in Canada). There is also a 2000 $Can for used car rebate and 500 $Can for electric bycicle, no mention of motorcycle. My interpretation is that if the Aptera don't get qualified as a car, Nova Scotia is not going to provide a rebate. More details when an official site is going to publish full details
Reading in detail SAAQ site, if the three wheeler has a structure to protect the driver, it is not a motorycle anymore. Tthe driver need only a standard class 5 driving license. In the case of the Tyrex and the Slingshot, an helmet is still required tough (???). That needs definitively to be ironed out
I got a response back from our local registry of motor vehicles, but it's kind of a non answer about the Aptera specifically, just what is currently allowed.
"Currently, the only non-single-track motorcycle permitted in Nova Scotia are the CanAm models as their specifications fall within Nova Scotia’s requirements under the Motor Vehicle Act. You may however submit a formal request to have the vehicle specifications reviewed. I will forward your enquiry to our operations departments for review. You can also submit your request in writing to registrar@novascotia.ca"
Personally, I think the Aptera is much more of a car than the CanAm trikes, so interesting to see what they'll decide once they have one in person to test perhaps.
JUST LOOKING AT PURCHASING AND HOW TO
JUST LOOKING AT PURCHASING AND HOW TO, TIM86SUE@GMAIL.COM
info@aptera.com is a better way to get your answer
Actually a better way would be to post the information in the FAQ
@Pierre Frisch
Info@aptera.us will reply. They have to be spinning with all the excitement since the Launch and the Wefunder investments Jumped!!!.
I would also suggest going to the wefunder site and ask the question to. Under ASK There are over three hundred FAQ there in this campaign alone
And then there were hundreds more under the first campaign, converted to WORD by Daniel:👏
https://mega.nz/file/cwEAGQSD#5D5xMF93QgZ34nWDW5IW3LWcI-FgrJ8oWl_bo5GHhnY
I know that Aptera was building on their FAQ list on their website but it is hard when their several hundred questions out there to include all😔
Just an FYI. 3 wheel vehicles are legal in Ontario, Canada under a 10 year pilot program by the ministry of transportation. Here's the highlights: - Only need a G class licence to drive - Registered as a motorcycle - Needs to have a seatbelt and use a helmet to operate
More details: Three-Wheeled Vehicles
Ontario launched a new pilot to permit three-wheeled vehicles (TWVs) on Ontario’s roads on March 1, 2016. Why is Ontario permitting three-wheeled vehicles? The pilot is intended to assess these vehicles over a ten-year period of time in order to examine their ability to safely integrate with other vehicle types to determine whether existing rules of the road are adequate and to and to consider operating and licensing requirements. About the pilot:
Only federally approved three-wheeled vehicles designed for on-road use are permitted to participate in the pilot;
The pilot will run for 10 years;
Current Highway Traffic Act (HTA) rules of the road and penalties apply to the driver/vehicle owner;
Operators are required to have a full G class driver’s licence or higher;
For the purposes of vehicle registration, three-wheeled vehicles are registered as motorcycles and pay the corresponding fee;
Three-wheeled vehicles are subject to Ontario’s mandatory seat belt requirements and the use of an approved motorcycle safety helmet;
Passengers who are classified as infants, toddlers, pre-schoolers or primary grade children are not permitted;
Three-wheeled vehicles are prohibited from being used for an Ontario driver’s licence road test;
No sidecars or trailers are permitted for use on a three-wheeled vehicle.
Safety features of three-wheeled vehicles Three-wheeled vehicles have fewer safety features than passenger cars. While the physical design of three-wheeled vehicles may resemble many safety features of passenger cars (e.g. seat belts, steering wheel, pedals), three-wheeled vehicles are not designed to satisfy the requirements of passenger cars. The safety regulations for three-wheeled vehicles used on roads are set out by the federal government in its Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations Schedule III. This strict pilot framework encourages innovation in Ontario’s automotive sector while maintaining road safety. For full details of the pilot project, please see Ontario Regulation 28/16. ONTARIO REGULATION 28/16
made under the
HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ACT
PILOT PROJECT - THREE-WHEELED VEHICLES
Made: February 10, 2016 Filed: February 12, 2016 Published on e-Laws: February 12, 2016 Printed in The Ontario Gazette: February 27, 2016
Interpretation
Definitions
1. In this Regulation,
“Ontario Regulation 340/94” means Ontario Regulation 340/94 (Drivers’ Licences) made under the Act;
“Ontario Regulation 376/02” means Ontario Regulation 376/02 (Classification of Vehicles as Irreparable, Salvage and Rebuilt) made under the Act;
“Regulation 587” means Regulation 587 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Equipment) made under the Act;
“Regulation 601” means Regulation 601 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Motor Vehicle Inspection Stations) made under the Act;
“Regulation 610” means Regulation 610 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Safety Helmets) made under the Act;
“Regulation 611” means Regulation 611 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Safety Inspections) made under the Act;
“Regulation 613” means Regulation 613 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Seat Belt Assemblies) made under the Act;
“Regulation 628” means Regulation 628 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Vehicle Permits) made under the Act.
“three-wheeled vehicle” means a motor vehicle, other than a motor tricycle as defined in Regulation 587, that,
(a) is designed to travel on three wheels in contact with the ground,
(b) has not more than four designated seating positions, and
(c) has a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating of 1,000 kilograms or less or, if it does not have a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating, the sum of its unloaded vehicle mass and the product obtained by multiplying its seating capacity by 68 kilograms is 1,000 kilograms or less.
Pilot Project
Pilot project established
2. (1) A pilot project to evaluate the use of three-wheeled vehicles on highways is established.
(2) The Minister shall conduct and complete an evaluation of the use of three-wheeled vehicles on highways under the pilot project before the tenth anniversary of the day this Regulation comes into force.
Prohibitions and Permitted Use
Prohibitions
3. (1) No person shall drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway, except as permitted by this Regulation.
(2) No person shall drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway with a passenger who is classified as an infant, toddler or pre-school to primary grade child under subsection 8 (1) of Regulation 613.
Permitted use of three-wheeled vehicles
4. A person may drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway if the vehicle,
(a) bears,
(i) in the case of a three-wheeled vehicle manufactured or built in Canada, the manufacturer’s compliance label issued under section 6 of the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations (Canada) specifying the type of vehicle as “TWV/VTR” or,
(ii) in the case of an imported three-wheeled vehicle, a compliance label or other label as provided for in section 12 of those Regulations;
(b) continues to meet the regulatory standards that applied to it at the time it was manufactured or imported;
(c) is in good working order;
(d) is not equipped with a side car or trailer; and
(e) is driven by a driver who holds a valid Class A, B, C, D, E, F or G driver’s licence that authorizes him or her to drive the vehicle or is a resident of another province, country or state, or a resident of Ontario for less than 60 days, who is authorized to drive the vehicle under subsection 34 (1) or (2) of the Act.
Application of Act and Regulations
Application of Act
5. The Act and the regulations apply to three-wheeled vehicles as provided in this Regulation.
Three-wheeled vehicle generally deemed not a motorcycle
6. Subject to sections 7, 8 and 9, a three-wheeled vehicle operated in accordance with this Regulation is deemed not to be a motorcycle for the purposes of the Act and the regulations, including, for greater certainty, for the purposes of Ontario Regulation 340/94.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for registration purposes
7. A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of the following:
1. Part II (Permits) of the Act.
2. Regulation 628.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for helmet requirements
8. A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of section 104 of the Act and Regulation 610.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for classification as irreparable, etc.
9. (1) A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of Ontario Regulation 376/02, other than subsections 2 (1) and (2) of that Regulation, which do not apply to a three-wheeled vehicle.
(2) If a person described in paragraph 1 of subsection 4 (1) of Ontario Regulation 376/02 is making the determination that a three-wheeled vehicle is irreparable, the determination shall be based on an inspection of the vehicle carried out by a person described in subsection 2 (1) or (2) of that Regulation.
(3) The definition of “irreparable” in subsection 1 (1) of Ontario Regulation 376/02 is modified in respect of three-wheeled vehicles as follows:
1. For a three-wheeled vehicle with a full frame assembly,
“irreparable” means a vehicle that,
(a) is a total loss and,
(i) has incurred structural damage requiring the replacement by cutting and welding of any integral part of its full frame assembly, or
(ii) has been stolen and dismantled such that the retail price for new parts of a like kind to replace those parts missing or damaged exceeds the fair labour cost to install or repair those parts, and,
(A) a settlement of an insurance claim has been paid for the vehicle as a total loss, or
(B) the vehicle is owned, leased or the plate portion of its vehicle permit is held by a person who is an insurer within the meaning of clause (b) of the definition of “insurer”, or
(b) is classified by the Registrar as irreparable under subsection 199.1 (11) of the Act.
2. For a three-wheeled vehicle with a unibody assembly,
“irreparable” means a vehicle that,
(a) is a total loss and,
(i) has been immersed in liquid to the bottom of its dashboard or higher,
(ii) any major part of its electrical system has been, or appears to have been, immersed in liquid,
(iii) has incurred damage requiring the replacement of one or more of the structural assemblies listed in Part 1, 2, 3 or 4 of the Schedule, or
(iv) has been stolen and dismantled such that the retail price for new parts of a like kind to replace those parts missing or damaged exceeds the fair labour cost to install or repair those parts, and,
(A) a settlement of an insurance claim has been paid for the vehicle as a total loss, or
(B) the vehicle is owned, leased or the plate portion of its vehicle permit is held by a person who is an insurer within the meaning of clause (b) of the definition of “insurer”, or
(b) is classified by the Registrar as irreparable under subsection 199.1 (11) of the Act.
Inspection requirements
10. (1) Despite section 3 of Regulation 611, the inspection requirements and performance standards contained in Schedules 1 and 2 to that Regulation that apply to a three-wheeled vehicle are subject to the following modification:
1. The chain, belt or driven sprocket shall not be excessively worn, frayed or loose and no fasteners in connection with those parts shall be missing, loose, cut or damaged.
(2) Despite section 3 of Regulation 601, a Type 1, 2 or 4 licence is authority to inspect and certify three-wheeled vehicles in accordance with the inspection requirements and performance standards contained in Schedules 1 and 2 to Regulation 611 as modified by subsection (1).
(3) Despite subsection 8 (3) of Regulation 601, a motor vehicle inspection mechanic who holds only a certificate of qualification in the trade of motorcycle technician may issue safety standards certificates for three-wheeled vehicles.
Reports
Reports to Minister
11. If requested to do so by the Minister, an owner of a three-wheeled vehicle shall report to the Minister on the owner’s use of the vehicle under the pilot project, or on any aspect of that use that may be specified by the Minister.
Amendment, Revocation and Commencement
Amendment
12. (1) Subsections 10 (1) and (2) are revoked and the following substituted:
Inspection requirements
(1) Despite section 3 of Regulation 611, the inspection requirements and performance standards that apply to a three-wheeled vehicle are contained in the Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard, subject to the following modifications:
1. The provisions dealing with electronic stability controls do not apply to a three-wheeled vehicle not manufactured with a stability control system.
2. The chain, belt or driven sprocket shall not be excessively worn, frayed or loose and no fasteners in connection with those parts shall be missing, loose, cut or damaged.
(2) Despite section 3 of Regulation 601, a Type 1, 2 or 4 licence is authority to inspect and certify three-wheeled vehicles in accordance with the inspection requirements and performance standards contained in the Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard as modified by subsection (1).
(2) Section 10 is amended by adding the following subsection:
(4) In this section,
“Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard” means the Reference Handbook entitled “Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard” in English and “Norme d’inspection des véhicules de tourisme et des véhicules utilitaires légers” in French, dated October 2015, published by the Ministry and available on a Government of Ontario website.
Revocation
13. This Regulation is revoked on the tenth anniversary of the day it comes into force.
Commencement
14. (1) Subject to subsection (2), this Regulation comes into force on the later of March 1, 2016 and the day this Regulation is filed.
(2) Section 12 comes into force on July 1, 2016.
Great info. Assuming Aptera will certify the vehicle in Canada. Wondering how it will run on snowy weather? I did put my reservation just in case.
@gabriel carneiro They've designed it with nordic climates in mind. It's got "vectorized traction control" to get you through any slippery stuff. Get snow tires on on and the AWD version for total control.
Hopefully the Aptera Merch store will offer "wear when needed" helmets designed for the vehicle...
Better yet, hopeefully wee get the laws revised in those few backward states that haven't yet been updated for autocycles.
I drive a three wheeled Vehicle called a Trihawk. 2 front, one back wheel, sit inside side by side, FWD, convertible. In BC Canada it is considered a 2 door convertible and we only need to wear the seat belts But one guy in Alberta Canada has one and has to wear a helmet because it is considered a motorcycle. So it depends on where you live. Has any one asked Apera about getting them approved for Canada?
Canadian Federal approval would be fantastic, but yeah the Motor Vehicle Acts are controlled by each Province, so it will differ by each one to some degree.
As long as it gets approved by NHTSA, I can't see Transport Canada making a fuss about it.
Some confirmation from Aptera or TC would be nice however for those who have reserved one. 😃
Another question: Will the Aptera qualify for the Federal iZEV rebate? That would be fantastic if it was included.
List of eligible vehicles under the iZEV Program (canada.ca)
Here the link for FAQ Canadian Federal programm: Zero-emission vehicles (canada.ca)
They need for now an extra wheel, so some lobbying is needed to modify the law (Electrica Mecannica here could be an ally), beside safety certification and that you select a trim with at least 15 kW battery to maximize the rebate. Also the higher trim above 60000$ would need to not be sold in Canada or branded differently:
vehicles with six seats or fewer, where the base model (trim) Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) is less than $45,000
higher priced versions (trims) of these vehicles, up to a maximum MSRP of $55,000, will also be eligible for an incentive
And
vehicles with seven seats or greater, where the base model MSRP is less than $55,000
higher priced versions (trims) of these vehicles, up to a maximum MSRP of $60,000, will also be eligible for an incentive
In all cases, to be eligible under the iZEV program, all vehicles must:
meet all Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
be intended for use on public streets, roads, and highways; and
have at least four functioning wheels and be highway capable (e.g. not a low-speed vehicle)
There are two levels of incentive:
Battery-electric, hydrogen fuel cell, and longer range plug-in hybrid vehicles (battery capacity is 15kWh or more) are eligible for an incentive of $5,000
Shorter range plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (battery capacity is less than 15kWh) are eligible for an incentive of $2,500
Please refer to the list of eligible vehicles.
I will check the Quebec and BC rebate programm. And those could change at any new budget or election.
Here the Quebec Programm : New electric vehicle rebate | vehiculeselectriques.gouv.qc.ca
All-electric vehicles
If the manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) is less than $60,000: $8,000
Electric motorcycles: $2,000
Note concerning electric motorcycles
To be eligible for the program, electric motorcycles must be in the "open motorcycle" or "motor tricycle" category as defined by the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations (CRC, c. 1038) and be entirely powered by electricity. They must be designed to travel on not more than three wheels and have a maximum speed of more than 70 km/h
The term open is puzzling, but the law refers to a federal definition. So my call minimum 2000$, maybe 8000$. Funny enough, no price limit if a motor cycle. Price limit if considered as a car, but don't care about superior trim, so long the car is sold below 60000 Can$. Now let check BC, they probably have their own set of arbitratry rules also
There is a few sites describing the 3000 $ BC rebate:
Eligible CEVforBC™ Vehicles | Clean Energy Vehicles for British Columbia | New Car Dealers of BC
Eligible CEVforBC™ Vehicles | Clean Energy Vehicles for British Columbia | New Car Dealers of BC
CleanBC | Go Electric BC | Government of British Columbia
Specialty-Use Vehicle Incentive Program - Plug In BC
Basically MRSP below 55 000 $ and at least 85 km of electrical range (no reference about battery size), no reference to price of upper trim. No definition of what is a car, beside that you must be on the updated yearly list. And the rebate is conditional that there is fund left for the fiscal year to finance the rebate.
ZEV Motorcycle got a 2000$ rebate. So the answer is 2000$ for sure, some lobbying to get a full 3000$ rebate
Aptera needs to assist with regulations for import and licensing requirements. Acquire and issue the appropriate regulatory documents. Especially in regards to helmet requirements... should not be needed as is fully enclosed, passed basic crash testing and is heavier than the Ontario pilot project limitations. Exemption stickers should be available.
Great, but I am living in Québec, not in Ontario, so what is matter to me is how it is going to be regulated in Québec. Quebec is notorious to not give a gnat how they do things in Ontario (or other provinces). I put down a deposit, so I have to trust you that Aptera is going to work the legalize hurdles. I might live with a 6e driving permit (one day training for 3 wheel vehicle in Quebec over the permit 5), but I will not going to wear an helmet every time I wan to ride a car. Bonne chance, so far it is exciting.
Yes, same here. I don't believe Nova Scotia has a 3 wheel program like Ontario either, but I have reached out to the RMV to see what or if they have any idea how it may be regulated in my province.
I'd think Québec would be pretty on board, as they have one of if not the highest BEV adoption rates in Canada, perhaps followed up by Ontario and BC, but agreed they usually like to go their own way on lots of things.
If I hear back from my RMV i'll post the response here to compare it to any other responses from other provinces.
I'm in Toronto and bummed about the "Helmet" requirement. That would be a deal changer for me. I do happen to have my motorcycle license, so if that were required, no problem, but if I'm buying this as a "2nd car", my wife definitely woldn't go for a helmet!!!.. By the time my order number comes up (18,000's) it will be the 3rd year, and maybe the regulations will be solved by then!!!
Could you/others in Canada complement any of the Aptera homologation efforts to change / modify things for motorcyles or enclosed autocycles ? And could forthcoming crash test , if proven to meet car results... provide more in regulatory talks?
Obviously I will keep an eye open on Aptera and other three-wheelers manufacturer effort to get certification in Canada and various provinces, as I reserved an Aptera car and I would like much getting through the process.
BC ministry of transport and icbc have a 3 wheeled vehicle category. It was implemented in around 2010. Vehicles in this category, don't require reverse, bumpers, and windows. It requires car plates not motorcycle. But I have not found any info on line so far. Aptera might go in this category.
Do the car plates have to be front and rear?
@Len Yes you need car plates front a rear. I had a problem putting one on my Trihawk. But I figured it out. It lies flat so it does not block the air intake for the air cooled engine. I put My trike on the road before this category came into effect. My Trike is considered a 2 door convertible.
Thanks for sharing
Here a link to incentive for electric vehicle in Yukon Territory: Apply for a rebate for a new zero-emission vehicle | Government of Yukon
5000 $Can for a vehicle battery above 15 KW, 3000$Can below 15 KW, car MRSP below 55000 $Can. There is a rebate for motorcycle (2 or 3 wheels) requiring a class 6 driving license. Again, everything rely on how the vehicle will be classified.
On a funny note,there is also a rebate for electric snowmobile
There is a all new incentive programm in Nova Scota, too new to have an official provincial government website. Here a link to one media:Nova Scotia to offer $19 million in rebates for electric cars, home energy efficiency - HalifaxToday.ca
Basically 3000 $Can for brand new vehicle (no spec for the battery). The MRSP must be 55 000 $Can or below (sounds like it is becoming a legislative standard in Canada). There is also a 2000 $Can for used car rebate and 500 $Can for electric bycicle, no mention of motorcycle. My interpretation is that if the Aptera don't get qualified as a car, Nova Scotia is not going to provide a rebate. More details when an official site is going to publish full details
Good summary on 3 wheeler in Canada, but it goes back to 2017, it might evolves. Definitively a lack of uniformity, form province to province: My Mechanic: Three Wheeled Vehicles- vicariousmag.com
Reading in detail SAAQ site, if the three wheeler has a structure to protect the driver, it is not a motorycle anymore. Tthe driver need only a standard class 5 driving license. In the case of the Tyrex and the Slingshot, an helmet is still required tough (???). That needs definitively to be ironed out
I had a friend that owned a slingshot and here in BC it is considered a car and no helmet was required And only class 5 drivers license
I got a response back from our local registry of motor vehicles, but it's kind of a non answer about the Aptera specifically, just what is currently allowed.
"Currently, the only non-single-track motorcycle permitted in Nova Scotia are the CanAm models as their specifications fall within Nova Scotia’s requirements under the Motor Vehicle Act. You may however submit a formal request to have the vehicle specifications reviewed. I will forward your enquiry to our operations departments for review. You can also submit your request in writing to registrar@novascotia.ca"
Personally, I think the Aptera is much more of a car than the CanAm trikes, so interesting to see what they'll decide once they have one in person to test perhaps.