🤔 I would imagine you may able to “gauge” insurance rate with your insurance company and your state, by applying the cost to insured a high end Can-Am or Polaris Slingshot, but then apply the cost to replace a much higher end Aptera, less deductions for key things like, it is an enclosed vehicle, with car safety devices as found in a cars, where they discount. . And it promises amazing crash tests! Surely much better than any open production title out there...
I believe I read in several places.... the Aptera should qualify to register as a motorcycle in most US states, except for maybe two
I have my 3 wheeled cars registered as cars in Ontario Canada. The insurance was much cheaper than as motorcycles. A precedent had been set for these antique cars as they preceded modern safety requirements. If the Aptera meets modern safety standards here it could be a car.
Note: This Regulation is revoked on March 1, 2026. (See: O. Reg. 28/16, s. 13)
Last amendment: O. Reg. 28/16.
This Regulation is made in English only.
Interpretation
Definitions
1. In this Regulation,
“Ontario Regulation 340/94” means Ontario Regulation 340/94 (Drivers’ Licences) made under the Act;
“Ontario Regulation 376/02” means Ontario Regulation 376/02 (Classification of Vehicles as Irreparable, Salvage and Rebuilt) made under the Act;
“Regulation 587” means Regulation 587 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Equipment) made under the Act;
“Regulation 601” means Regulation 601 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Motor Vehicle Inspection Stations) made under the Act;
“Regulation 610” means Regulation 610 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Safety Helmets) made under the Act;
“Regulation 611” means Regulation 611 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Safety Inspections) made under the Act;
“Regulation 613” means Regulation 613 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Seat Belt Assemblies) made under the Act;
“Regulation 628” means Regulation 628 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Vehicle Permits) made under the Act.
“three-wheeled vehicle” means a motor vehicle, other than a motor tricycle as defined in Regulation 587, that,
(a) is designed to travel on three wheels in contact with the ground,
(b) has not more than four designated seating positions, and
(c) has a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating of 1,000 kilograms or less or, if it does not have a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating, the sum of its unloaded vehicle mass and the product obtained by multiplying its seating capacity by 68 kilograms is 1,000 kilograms or less.
Pilot Project
Pilot project established
2. (1) A pilot project to evaluate the use of three-wheeled vehicles on highways is established.
(2) The Minister shall conduct and complete an evaluation of the use of three-wheeled vehicles on highways under the pilot project before the tenth anniversary of the day this Regulation comes into force.
Prohibitions and Permitted Use
Prohibitions
3. (1) No person shall drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway, except as permitted by this Regulation.
(2) No person shall drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway with a passenger who is classified as an infant, toddler or pre-school to primary grade child under subsection 8 (1) of Regulation 613.
Permitted use of three-wheeled vehicles
4. A person may drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway if the vehicle,
(a) bears,
(i) in the case of a three-wheeled vehicle manufactured or built in Canada, the manufacturer’s compliance label issued under section 6 of the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations (Canada) specifying the type of vehicle as “TWV/VTR” or,
(ii) in the case of an imported three-wheeled vehicle, a compliance label or other label as provided for in section 12 of those Regulations;
(b) continues to meet the regulatory standards that applied to it at the time it was manufactured or imported;
(c) is in good working order;
(d) is not equipped with a side car or trailer; and
(e) is driven by a driver who holds a valid Class A, B, C, D, E, F or G driver’s licence that authorizes him or her to drive the vehicle or is a resident of another province, country or state, or a resident of Ontario for less than 60 days, who is authorized to drive the vehicle under subsection 34 (1) or (2) of the Act.
Application of Act and Regulations
Application of Act
5. The Act and the regulations apply to three-wheeled vehicles as provided in this Regulation.
Three-wheeled vehicle generally deemed not a motorcycle
6. Subject to sections 7, 8 and 9, a three-wheeled vehicle operated in accordance with this Regulation is deemed not to be a motorcycle for the purposes of the Act and the regulations, including, for greater certainty, for the purposes of Ontario Regulation 340/94.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for registration purposes
7. A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of the following:
1. Part II (Permits) of the Act.
2. Regulation 628.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for helmet requirements
8. A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of section 104 of the Act and Regulation 610.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for classification as irreparable, etc.
9. (1) A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of Ontario Regulation 376/02, other than subsections 2 (1) and (2) of that Regulation, which do not apply to a three-wheeled vehicle.
(2) If a person described in paragraph 1 of subsection 4 (1) of Ontario Regulation 376/02 is making the determination that a three-wheeled vehicle is irreparable, the determination shall be based on an inspection of the vehicle carried out by a person described in subsection 2 (1) or (2) of that Regulation.
(3) The definition of “irreparable” in subsection 1 (1) of Ontario Regulation 376/02 is modified in respect of three-wheeled vehicles as follows:
1. For a three-wheeled vehicle with a full frame assembly,
“irreparable” means a vehicle that,
(a) is a total loss and,
(i) has incurred structural damage requiring the replacement by cutting and welding of any integral part of its full frame assembly, or
(ii) has been stolen and dismantled such that the retail price for new parts of a like kind to replace those parts missing or damaged exceeds the fair labour cost to install or repair those parts, and,
(A) a settlement of an insurance claim has been paid for the vehicle as a total loss, or
(B) the vehicle is owned, leased or the plate portion of its vehicle permit is held by a person who is an insurer within the meaning of clause (b) of the definition of “insurer”, or
(b) is classified by the Registrar as irreparable under subsection 199.1 (11) of the Act.
2. For a three-wheeled vehicle with a unibody assembly,
“irreparable” means a vehicle that,
(a) is a total loss and,
(i) has been immersed in liquid to the bottom of its dashboard or higher,
(ii) any major part of its electrical system has been, or appears to have been, immersed in liquid,
(iii) has incurred damage requiring the replacement of one or more of the structural assemblies listed in Part 1, 2, 3 or 4 of the Schedule, or
(iv) has been stolen and dismantled such that the retail price for new parts of a like kind to replace those parts missing or damaged exceeds the fair labour cost to install or repair those parts, and,
(A) a settlement of an insurance claim has been paid for the vehicle as a total loss, or
(B) the vehicle is owned, leased or the plate portion of its vehicle permit is held by a person who is an insurer within the meaning of clause (b) of the definition of “insurer”, or
(b) is classified by the Registrar as irreparable under subsection 199.1 (11) of the Act.
Inspection requirements
10. (1) Despite section 3 of Regulation 611, the inspection requirements and performance standards that apply to a three-wheeled vehicle are contained in the Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard, subject to the following modifications:
1. The provisions dealing with electronic stability controls do not apply to a three-wheeled vehicle not manufactured with a stability control system.
2. The chain, belt or driven sprocket shall not be excessively worn, frayed or loose and no fasteners in connection with those parts shall be missing, loose, cut or damaged. O. Reg. 28/16, s. 12 (1).
(2) Despite section 3 of Regulation 601, a Type 1, 2 or 4 licence is authority to inspect and certify three-wheeled vehicles in accordance with the inspection requirements and performance standards contained in the Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard as modified by subsection (1). O. Reg. 28/16, s. 12 (1).
(3) Despite subsection 8 (3) of Regulation 601, a motor vehicle inspection mechanic who holds only a certificate of qualification in the trade of motorcycle technician may issue safety standards certificates for three-wheeled vehicles.
(4) In this section,
“Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard” means the Reference Handbook entitled “Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard” in English and “Norme d’inspection des véhicules de tourisme et des véhicules utilitaires légers” in French, dated October 2015, published by the Ministry and available on a Government of Ontario website. O. Reg. 28/16, s. 12 (2).
Reports
Reports to Minister
11. If requested to do so by the Minister, an owner of a three-wheeled vehicle shall report to the Minister on the owner’s use of the vehicle under the pilot project, or on any aspect of that use that may be specified by the Minister.
12. Omitted (provides for amendments to this Regulation).
Revocation
13. This Regulation is revoked on the tenth anniversary of the day it comes into force.
14. Omitted (provides for coming into force of provisions of this Regulation).
The last time I spoke to the team about this very question, they were working very hard to get this vehicle classified as a car. They wanted all consumers to be able to operate it with a regular license. They seemed confident that their main shell design was robust enough to supply suitable crash protection to pass the safety requirements.
Granted, this was several years ago, plans change, teams change, targets move.
3 wheel vehicles are registered as a motorcycle. It should be very low cost to register. A few states charge an extra fee for an all electric since it doesn't pay gas tax that supposedly helps pay for roads and bridges. Each state is different. A few states charge less if all electric since it doesn't make pollution.
While this is historically true in most states, please see my response above. The team was working very hard to get this classified as a car. (I was in the facility and asked them this very question)
Yes, everything I recently read said moving in the direction to have it registered as a motorcycle.
But we would not need a motorcycle license! A car license is adequate
“As a motorcycle“...that could help with no need for conventional car sideview mirrors , allowing the video camera instead, showing the view on the interior video screens
✅ I don’t want to wear a helmet, as the Aptera is my helmet
✅ Well typically EV auto federal incentives are better than motorcycles but who knows what will be offered 2021 and forward “these days”
✅ I already have a driver’s license
Motorcycle
✅ Lower routine registration cost
✅ Insurance cost might be based on purchase price but surely a stellar crash test and safety features, all projected.... could lower insurance cost.
✅ This might make it easier to get away from convention side view mirrors and just have the illustrated rear and side view cameras showing views on the interior video screens
✅ Auto driver’s license should be adequate even if classified as a motorcycle
Regardless of classification it should qualify for HOV use, even with just one person on board
Tolls and Transport (like ferries) costs? TBD (Typically number of wheels or axles and vehicle weight factor in)
Here in BC Canada Motorcycle insurance for the bigger 1150 cc bikes and over are outrageously priced for insurance, compared to a car or truck . And having to wear a helmet in this (I consider a car ) would be foolish.
Hey Gerry, you should mention that your Trihawk is licensed as a car in BC, where mine is licensed as a motorcycle in the next door Province of Alberta.
@Brian LeBlanc Considering that the Aptera body is pretty much analogous to an Igloo Cooler (two composite surfaces with foam in between) and will have interior heating and seat heaters, I'm guessing it will be as comfortable as any other vehicle. As to the range, I would guess that the range will drop with the temperature, just like every other EV on the market: It's the nature of Lithium Ion batteries to lose capacity when cold.
good to hear about the interior heat, but I would like to know the range at low temperatures, have they considered and possibly improved the issues in some way of keeping the batteries warm as well.
@Brian LeBlanc Most EVs do warm their batteries - Tesla even pre-warms its packs automatically when the vehicle knows you're heading to a charging station. But the issue is multi-faceted and has to do with the chemical reaction occurring in the battery as well as the weather: There has been much research done on this topic. On average, EVs seem to lose approx. 20% of their range when the temperatures drop. There are a number of Canadian EV channels on YouTube - with plenty of owner testimonials.
Remember - Aptera is just starting: They have ONE prototype vehicle on the road and two more in the works. It will be some time before they've created a test fleet for real-world evaluation.
🤔 I would imagine you may able to “gauge” insurance rate with your insurance company and your state, by applying the cost to insured a high end Can-Am or Polaris Slingshot, but then apply the cost to replace a much higher end Aptera, less deductions for key things like, it is an enclosed vehicle, with car safety devices as found in a cars, where they discount. . And it promises amazing crash tests! Surely much better than any open production title out there...
I believe I read in several places.... the Aptera should qualify to register as a motorcycle in most US states, except for maybe two
I have my 3 wheeled cars registered as cars in Ontario Canada. The insurance was much cheaper than as motorcycles. A precedent had been set for these antique cars as they preceded modern safety requirements. If the Aptera meets modern safety standards here it could be a car.
Ontario, Canada laws regarding 3 wheeled vehicles. - Does the Aptera have a seatbelt? Highway Traffic Act Code de la route
ONTARIO REGULATION 28/16
PILOT PROJECT - THREE-WHEELED VEHICLES
Consolidation Period: From July 1, 2016 to the e-Laws currency date.
Note: This Regulation is revoked on March 1, 2026. (See: O. Reg. 28/16, s. 13)
Last amendment: O. Reg. 28/16.
This Regulation is made in English only.
Interpretation
Definitions
1. In this Regulation,
“Ontario Regulation 340/94” means Ontario Regulation 340/94 (Drivers’ Licences) made under the Act;
“Ontario Regulation 376/02” means Ontario Regulation 376/02 (Classification of Vehicles as Irreparable, Salvage and Rebuilt) made under the Act;
“Regulation 587” means Regulation 587 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Equipment) made under the Act;
“Regulation 601” means Regulation 601 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Motor Vehicle Inspection Stations) made under the Act;
“Regulation 610” means Regulation 610 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Safety Helmets) made under the Act;
“Regulation 611” means Regulation 611 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Safety Inspections) made under the Act;
“Regulation 613” means Regulation 613 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Seat Belt Assemblies) made under the Act;
“Regulation 628” means Regulation 628 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (Vehicle Permits) made under the Act.
“three-wheeled vehicle” means a motor vehicle, other than a motor tricycle as defined in Regulation 587, that,
(a) is designed to travel on three wheels in contact with the ground,
(b) has not more than four designated seating positions, and
(c) has a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating of 1,000 kilograms or less or, if it does not have a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating, the sum of its unloaded vehicle mass and the product obtained by multiplying its seating capacity by 68 kilograms is 1,000 kilograms or less.
Pilot Project
Pilot project established
2. (1) A pilot project to evaluate the use of three-wheeled vehicles on highways is established.
(2) The Minister shall conduct and complete an evaluation of the use of three-wheeled vehicles on highways under the pilot project before the tenth anniversary of the day this Regulation comes into force.
Prohibitions and Permitted Use
Prohibitions
3. (1) No person shall drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway, except as permitted by this Regulation.
(2) No person shall drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway with a passenger who is classified as an infant, toddler or pre-school to primary grade child under subsection 8 (1) of Regulation 613.
Permitted use of three-wheeled vehicles
4. A person may drive or permit the operation of a three-wheeled vehicle on a highway if the vehicle,
(a) bears,
(i) in the case of a three-wheeled vehicle manufactured or built in Canada, the manufacturer’s compliance label issued under section 6 of the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations (Canada) specifying the type of vehicle as “TWV/VTR” or,
(ii) in the case of an imported three-wheeled vehicle, a compliance label or other label as provided for in section 12 of those Regulations;
(b) continues to meet the regulatory standards that applied to it at the time it was manufactured or imported;
(c) is in good working order;
(d) is not equipped with a side car or trailer; and
(e) is driven by a driver who holds a valid Class A, B, C, D, E, F or G driver’s licence that authorizes him or her to drive the vehicle or is a resident of another province, country or state, or a resident of Ontario for less than 60 days, who is authorized to drive the vehicle under subsection 34 (1) or (2) of the Act.
Application of Act and Regulations
Application of Act
5. The Act and the regulations apply to three-wheeled vehicles as provided in this Regulation.
Three-wheeled vehicle generally deemed not a motorcycle
6. Subject to sections 7, 8 and 9, a three-wheeled vehicle operated in accordance with this Regulation is deemed not to be a motorcycle for the purposes of the Act and the regulations, including, for greater certainty, for the purposes of Ontario Regulation 340/94.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for registration purposes
7. A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of the following:
1. Part II (Permits) of the Act.
2. Regulation 628.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for helmet requirements
8. A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of section 104 of the Act and Regulation 610.
Three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle for classification as irreparable, etc.
9. (1) A three-wheeled vehicle is a motorcycle, and shall be treated as such, for the purposes of Ontario Regulation 376/02, other than subsections 2 (1) and (2) of that Regulation, which do not apply to a three-wheeled vehicle.
(2) If a person described in paragraph 1 of subsection 4 (1) of Ontario Regulation 376/02 is making the determination that a three-wheeled vehicle is irreparable, the determination shall be based on an inspection of the vehicle carried out by a person described in subsection 2 (1) or (2) of that Regulation.
(3) The definition of “irreparable” in subsection 1 (1) of Ontario Regulation 376/02 is modified in respect of three-wheeled vehicles as follows:
1. For a three-wheeled vehicle with a full frame assembly,
“irreparable” means a vehicle that,
(a) is a total loss and,
(i) has incurred structural damage requiring the replacement by cutting and welding of any integral part of its full frame assembly, or
(ii) has been stolen and dismantled such that the retail price for new parts of a like kind to replace those parts missing or damaged exceeds the fair labour cost to install or repair those parts, and,
(A) a settlement of an insurance claim has been paid for the vehicle as a total loss, or
(B) the vehicle is owned, leased or the plate portion of its vehicle permit is held by a person who is an insurer within the meaning of clause (b) of the definition of “insurer”, or
(b) is classified by the Registrar as irreparable under subsection 199.1 (11) of the Act.
2. For a three-wheeled vehicle with a unibody assembly,
“irreparable” means a vehicle that,
(a) is a total loss and,
(i) has been immersed in liquid to the bottom of its dashboard or higher,
(ii) any major part of its electrical system has been, or appears to have been, immersed in liquid,
(iii) has incurred damage requiring the replacement of one or more of the structural assemblies listed in Part 1, 2, 3 or 4 of the Schedule, or
(iv) has been stolen and dismantled such that the retail price for new parts of a like kind to replace those parts missing or damaged exceeds the fair labour cost to install or repair those parts, and,
(A) a settlement of an insurance claim has been paid for the vehicle as a total loss, or
(B) the vehicle is owned, leased or the plate portion of its vehicle permit is held by a person who is an insurer within the meaning of clause (b) of the definition of “insurer”, or
(b) is classified by the Registrar as irreparable under subsection 199.1 (11) of the Act.
Inspection requirements
10. (1) Despite section 3 of Regulation 611, the inspection requirements and performance standards that apply to a three-wheeled vehicle are contained in the Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard, subject to the following modifications:
1. The provisions dealing with electronic stability controls do not apply to a three-wheeled vehicle not manufactured with a stability control system.
2. The chain, belt or driven sprocket shall not be excessively worn, frayed or loose and no fasteners in connection with those parts shall be missing, loose, cut or damaged. O. Reg. 28/16, s. 12 (1).
(2) Despite section 3 of Regulation 601, a Type 1, 2 or 4 licence is authority to inspect and certify three-wheeled vehicles in accordance with the inspection requirements and performance standards contained in the Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard as modified by subsection (1). O. Reg. 28/16, s. 12 (1).
(3) Despite subsection 8 (3) of Regulation 601, a motor vehicle inspection mechanic who holds only a certificate of qualification in the trade of motorcycle technician may issue safety standards certificates for three-wheeled vehicles.
(4) In this section,
“Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard” means the Reference Handbook entitled “Passenger/Light-Duty Vehicle Inspection Standard” in English and “Norme d’inspection des véhicules de tourisme et des véhicules utilitaires légers” in French, dated October 2015, published by the Ministry and available on a Government of Ontario website. O. Reg. 28/16, s. 12 (2).
Reports
Reports to Minister
11. If requested to do so by the Minister, an owner of a three-wheeled vehicle shall report to the Minister on the owner’s use of the vehicle under the pilot project, or on any aspect of that use that may be specified by the Minister.
12. Omitted (provides for amendments to this Regulation).
Revocation
13. This Regulation is revoked on the tenth anniversary of the day it comes into force.
14. Omitted (provides for coming into force of provisions of this Regulation).
The last time I spoke to the team about this very question, they were working very hard to get this vehicle classified as a car. They wanted all consumers to be able to operate it with a regular license. They seemed confident that their main shell design was robust enough to supply suitable crash protection to pass the safety requirements.
Granted, this was several years ago, plans change, teams change, targets move.
3 wheel vehicles are registered as a motorcycle. It should be very low cost to register. A few states charge an extra fee for an all electric since it doesn't pay gas tax that supposedly helps pay for roads and bridges. Each state is different. A few states charge less if all electric since it doesn't make pollution.
While this is historically true in most states, please see my response above. The team was working very hard to get this classified as a car. (I was in the facility and asked them this very question)
Yes, everything I recently read said moving in the direction to have it registered as a motorcycle.
But we would not need a motorcycle license! A car license is adequate
“As a motorcycle“...that could help with no need for conventional car sideview mirrors , allowing the video camera instead, showing the view on the interior video screens
Jstackeaa, can I ask which insurance company insures your autocycles. as would like to talk to their agents In AZ . thx
Here's an informative piece from 2017. It explains where all the states stand on the "not-four-wheeled-vehicle" issue:
https://www.ncsl.org/research/transportation/transportation-review-autocycles.aspx
🤔 From my street corner...
Regarding....
Autocycle
✅ I like the name better than motorcycle
✅ I don’t want to wear a helmet, as the Aptera is my helmet
✅ Well typically EV auto federal incentives are better than motorcycles but who knows what will be offered 2021 and forward “these days”
✅ I already have a driver’s license
Motorcycle
✅ Lower routine registration cost
✅ Insurance cost might be based on purchase price but surely a stellar crash test and safety features, all projected.... could lower insurance cost.
✅ This might make it easier to get away from convention side view mirrors and just have the illustrated rear and side view cameras showing views on the interior video screens
✅ Auto driver’s license should be adequate even if classified as a motorcycle
Regardless of classification it should qualify for HOV use, even with just one person on board
Tolls and Transport (like ferries) costs? TBD (Typically number of wheels or axles and vehicle weight factor in)
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2381/text
Here in BC Canada Motorcycle insurance for the bigger 1150 cc bikes and over are outrageously priced for insurance, compared to a car or truck . And having to wear a helmet in this (I consider a car ) would be foolish.
Hey Gerry, you should mention that your Trihawk is licensed as a car in BC, where mine is licensed as a motorcycle in the next door Province of Alberta.
@Brian LeBlanc I did mention that some where on this site
I’m very curious about range and comfort here in Canada when the temp drops to -35C.
@Brian LeBlanc Considering that the Aptera body is pretty much analogous to an Igloo Cooler (two composite surfaces with foam in between) and will have interior heating and seat heaters, I'm guessing it will be as comfortable as any other vehicle. As to the range, I would guess that the range will drop with the temperature, just like every other EV on the market: It's the nature of Lithium Ion batteries to lose capacity when cold.
good to hear about the interior heat, but I would like to know the range at low temperatures, have they considered and possibly improved the issues in some way of keeping the batteries warm as well.
@Brian LeBlanc Most EVs do warm their batteries - Tesla even pre-warms its packs automatically when the vehicle knows you're heading to a charging station. But the issue is multi-faceted and has to do with the chemical reaction occurring in the battery as well as the weather: There has been much research done on this topic. On average, EVs seem to lose approx. 20% of their range when the temperatures drop. There are a number of Canadian EV channels on YouTube - with plenty of owner testimonials.
Remember - Aptera is just starting: They have ONE prototype vehicle on the road and two more in the works. It will be some time before they've created a test fleet for real-world evaluation.